Definitions of art /
In the last thirty years, work in analytic philosophy of art has flourished, and it has given rise to considerable controversy. Stephen Davies describes and analyzes the definition of art as it has been discussed in Anglo-American philosophy during this period and, in the process, introduces his own...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ithaca, N.Y. :
Cornell University Press,
1991
Ithaca, N.Y. : 1991 Ithaca, N.Y. : 1991 |
| Subjects: |
| Summary: | In the last thirty years, work in analytic philosophy of art has flourished, and it has given rise to considerable controversy. Stephen Davies describes and analyzes the definition of art as it has been discussed in Anglo-American philosophy during this period and, in the process, introduces his own perspective on ways in which we should reorient our thinking In the last thirty years, work in analytic philosophy of art has flourished, and it has given rise to considerably controversy. Stephen Davies describes and analyzes the definition of art as it has been discussed in Anglo-American philosophy during this period and, in the process, introduces his own perspective on ways in which we should reorient our thinking.Davies conceives of the debate as revealing two basic, conflicting approaches—the functional and the procedural—to the questions of whether art can be defined, and if so, how. As the author sees it, the functionalist believes that an object is a work of art only if it performs a particular function (usually, that of providing a rewarding aesthetic experience). By contrast the proceduralist believes that something is an artwork only if it has been created according to certain rules and procedures. Davies attempts to demonstrate the fruitfulness of viewing the debate in terms of this framework, and he develops new arguments against both points of view—although he is more critical of functional than of procedural definitions.Because it has generated so much of the recent literature, Davies starts his analysis with a discussion of Morris Weitz's germinal paper, "The Role of Theory in Aesthetics." He goes on to examine other important works by Arthur Danto, George Dickie, and Ben Tilghman and develops in his critiques original arguments on such matters of the artificiality of artworks and the relevance of artists' intentions |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | This WorldCat-derived record is shareable under Open Data Commons ODC-BY, with attribution to OCLC |
| Physical Description: | x, 243 p. ; 22 cm x, 243 p. ; 23 cm x, 243 pages ; 23 cm |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references (p. 223-237) and index Includes bibliographical references (pages 223-237) and index Includes bibliographical references and index |
| ISBN: | 0801425689 (alk. paper) 0801425689 (cloth : alk. paper) 0801425689 0801497949 (paper : alk. paper) 0801497949 (pbk. : alk. paper) 0801497949 9780801425684 (cloth : alk. paper) 9780801425684 9780801497940 (paper : alk. paper) 9780801497940 |